|
08-22-2012, 09:21 PM
|
#1
|
New Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 8
|
60 Series vs. 6V92 series newell coach ?
Hi all!
My question is about engines. I'm tossed here. I am interested in 2 different coaches in 2 different era's one with the 6v92T and another with the 60 series engine. I have been told the 60 series is quiter, more fuel efficient, and is an overall higher quality engine than the 92 series.
My question is does the 60 series really outperform the 6v92 as much as I've been told?
The wife wants the more classic look and I prefer the smooth side which is why I'm stuck so hopefully we can compromise
Aussies
__________________
|
|
|
08-22-2012, 09:47 PM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Sam Carlos, Sonora, Mex.
Posts: 407
|
This is a matter of opinion, and my opinion is that the 6v92 is an old, 2 cycle, out of date engine. The modern 4 cycle Series 60 computer controlled engine is the only one I would consider. I ran twin 6-71s for many years in a boat and they were very reliable. However, it may boil down to a question of price since the 6v92 is in the older Newells.
__________________
__________________
2001 Newell #579
tow a 2011 Honda Odyssey
1935 Mercedes 500K replica
|
|
|
08-23-2012, 12:09 AM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Houma, LA
Posts: 886
|
Ausssies,
I agree with Chester, I would prefer the series 60 engine over a 6V92. A series 60 in a 45' Newell driving 60 mph can get 8 + miles per gallon. A similiar Newell with a 6V92 would get about 5.5 or 6.0 mpg. Also, the computer on the series 60 engine makes driving in the mountains a snap; all you have to do is push the accelerator to the floor and the computer does the rest.
With a 6V92 you have to watch the boost and be careful not to overheat when climbing steep grades.
The series 60 can go 1,000,000 miles between overhauls. I'm not sure about the 6V92.
Both are good engines and if properly maintained will give you many miles of good service.
__________________
Tuga & Karen Gaidry
1999 Newell 45 w/2 slides
Coach #512
2005 Pilot
|
|
|
08-23-2012, 12:35 AM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,018
|
6V92TA 330-350 HP
6-8 MPG
300-400K engine
60 series 475-500HP
7-10 MPG
750-1million engine
In my opion the 60 series 4 stroke is far superior to 6V92 2 stroke but I do agree that they are both good engines.
__________________
1976 Newell Classic (Sold)
Home Base: Riverside, CA
If anyone needs my contact info private message me and I will send it to you.
-Joseph-
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
Thread |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post |
polishing aluminum wheels
|
doug nichols |
Running Gear, Brakes, Tires, Chassis and Pneumatic Systems |
6 |
02-13-2012 03:08 PM |
Avatars
|
rheavn |
High Technology for the Big Rig RV |
17 |
05-16-2010 01:53 AM |
inverter wiring...Help!!
|
Retired Phil |
General Technical Discussion |
0 |
10-03-2006 03:34 AM |
Need help on a bumper issue
|
brians house |
Exterior Works |
1 |
09-18-2006 01:10 AM |
|
» Recent Threads |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:09 PM.