Thanks Michael,
I'm not criticizing your post ; but I would like to draw attention to the author.
I've seen & read that article at so many Forums ('RVers Online' - 'Escapees
Forum' - 'Open Roads Forum' and others) and now here, why not !
Bob Gummersall : I don't have nothing against him. He is not the Chief Technical
Officer for RVers Online, but was at a certain time (Big Deal !) ~ He loves to write
on any related RV subject. ~ He's '
No Engineer' and anybody can be call a
'Technical Person,' I guest !
«~» Here's another Article related to your post ;
--»Entire Article CLICK HERE :
'NEW DIESEL PUSHER CHASSIS PRODUCTS'«--; Bob Gummersall Quote :
". . . here's an article that I evaluated a frame rail chassis built by Western RV called
the ‘Peak’ that
had performance, handling, balance and durability that rivals any
semi-monocoque chassis."
I wonder, how can a person or writer can come up
with such a powerful statement ?
2 articles on the same mater and the First will contradict the Second !
«~» Here's a beauty, another writer @ 'RVers Online';
. . .
my basic RV assumptions are similar to those used in Bob Gummersall’s
paper. (
assumption = best guess) Wow ! Perhaps the reason why they aren't Paid !
«~» Dictionaries and even Online Dictionaries will even tell me more.
»»»»»»»»» 'NewellClassic.com' ««««««« ~ »»»»»»» 'NewellClassic.com' «««««««««
~ Perhaps I mislead you folks
«~» But the 'Real Question is :'
« ? » What appends when a
'Monocoque (Prevost)' chassis is punctured to
accommodate a slide ? Do you still call-it a
'Monocoque chassis ?' or what ?
»»»»»» 'NewellClassic.com' «««««« ~ »»»»»» 'NewellClassic.com' ««««««
May God Bless
KC