As if the already lucrative insider trading incentive open to congress was not enough - Luxury Coach Lifestyles
Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
Go Back   Luxury Coach Lifestyles > Coach Talk! > Off-Topic Discussions & Humor
Register FAQ Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Log in Click Here to Login
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-17-2013, 01:12 AM   #1
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Rolling Along!
Posts: 51
Default As if the already lucrative insider trading incentive open to congress was not enough

[TD="class: postHeader, colspan: 2"]Now Obama is scratching congresses back with his way of saying thank you boys!
Insider Dealing For Insider Trading: Congress Guts STOCK Act Reporting Requirements

[TD]By: DSWright Monday April 15, 2013 10:31 am[/TD]
[TD="align: right"][/TD]
<embed src="" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" flashvars="si=254&&contentValue=50114839&shareUrl=" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" background="#333333" salign="lt" scale="noscale" height="279" width="425">
Remember that Congressional insider trading scandal? The one where Congress members were caught trading stocks and bonds on insider information, an apparent crime for everyone else but Congress? Well, after a lot of public posturing leading to the passage of a reform law (with resulting positive press coverage) – Congress is back to their old tricks.

Congress approved a bill Friday to eliminate expanded financial-disclosure reporting requirements for Senior Executive Service members, just days before the new requirements were to go into effect.

The bill indefinitely suspends the filing requirements for 28,000 Executive Branch employees, including SES members. The Senate approved the measure by unanimous consent Thursday evening. The House followed suit Friday.

So much for reform.

The Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge (STOCK) Act, which Congress passed last spring, was designed to deter insider trading by members of Congress and some 28,000 senior federal employees. Under the bill, these feds were be required to file reports of new transactions in stocks, bonds, commodities or other securities that exceed $1,000 to the Office of Government Ethics — information that would eventually wind up on a publicly searchable database .

Along with SES members, the new measure also exempts congressional staff.

Why should future lobbyists have to disclose their financial statements? How can they double deal and sell the public out if they have to tell everyone about it? See, the original bill was not pragmatic enough.

These exemptions undermine the entire point of the bill. The STOCK act was, not surprisingly, opposed by the Senior Executives Association who did not want SES members to face public scrutiny. This concern was properly overruled during the bill’s passage due to the recognition that the public interest in knowing whether or not SES members were insider trading is more important than the fear of facing inspection. Not to mention, if you want to work for the government you should be expected to conform to these standards and embrace transparency. It is called the public sector for a reason, these are employees’ financial and not health records. It is more than reasonable for the public to know if there are any conflicts of interests among the people they are paying to serve them.

Even more indefensible is the exemption for congressional staffers. This is precisely who requires oversight. These are exactly the people who often engage in the most inappropriate conduct regarding, shall we say, extracurricular compensation. The staffers and the industry lobbyists are the real gears that drive the machine in Washington. Letting congressional staffers escape transparency negates the entire purpose of the law.

Instead of of embracing the proverb of sunshine is the best disinfectant, Congress is trying to treat the public like mushrooms – feed them crap and keep in the dark. <strike>If President Obama is serious about changing Washington, he must veto this attempt at gutting the STOCK Act.</strike> Obama has now signed the law.
Bob & Deena
1998 Barth Regency Custom 38'
Cummins with Allison 6 spd
2002 Honda LX Manual Trans
Blue Ox Aladdin Tow Bar

Interested in Trading Up to a Larger Luxury Coach
Like a Newell, Wanderlodge, Featherlite, Marathon, Millennium, will Consider Others
Barthman is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Volkner Mobil speedingsport General Luxury Coach Discussion 3 04-14-2013 04:56 PM
Can I spray WD 40 on my 50 to 30 amp adapter Viva Las Vegas JDR General Technical Discussion 9 02-23-2013 05:26 PM
washing and waxing encantotom Exterior Works 14 07-02-2012 06:38 PM
Hi! Newbies here! 1992 42 Newell #290 Introduce Yourself - Welcome Wagon 3 09-08-2009 12:41 AM

» Recent Threads
» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

This website is not affiliated with or endorsed by Newell Coach Corporation or any of its affiliates. This is an independent, unofficial site.

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:49 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.